States that pick & choose when #humanrights apply undermine the concept of human rights http://ow.ly/YkRmA
-
-
@swedenvsassange@Alfreddezayas A. Court also writes Assange can leave Embassy whenever he wants&it is not detention-based on ECtHR case law -
@Klamberg@Alfreddezayas UN experts considered & rejected this. Extensive ECHR caselaw supports#Assange paras 35-49 https://justice4assange.com/IMG/pdf/assange-wgad.pdf … -
@swedenvsassange@Alfreddezayas in which para do UNWGAD mention and discuss the fact that Assange entered the Embassy voluntarily? -
@Klamberg@Alfreddezayas Assange exercises fundamental right to seek asylum. UK spends $20m encircling embassy, Sweden acting arbitrarily. -
@swedenvsassange@Alfreddezayas is there any other case when person avoids justice by leaving territory of jurisdiction considered detained? -
@Klamberg@Alfreddezayas If you read WGAD's opinion it's clear Assange has never 'avoided' anything, but rather prosecutor breaching duty
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@swedenvsassange@Alfreddezayas yes Appeals court critical, the Prosecutor took due notice&action of this which made Supreme Court content -
@Klamberg@Alfreddezayas Prosecutor ignored Court of Appeal's rebuke for 4 months. Only changed her position when she was bound to lose SC.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.