States that pick & choose when #humanrights apply undermine the concept of human rights http://ow.ly/YkRmA
-
-
@swedenvsassange@UNHumanRights@Alfreddezayas in which para does the Supreme Court say the Prosecutor violates her profesional duties? 2/2 -
@Klamberg@UNHumanRights@Alfreddezayas I'm happy to find the paras for you if you are interested in reading the two judgments. -
@swedenvsassange@UNHumanRights@Alfreddezayas I have already read them, please enlighten me by using pinpoint references -
@Klamberg@Alfreddezayas Paras 17-19 of the Supreme Court judgment and this passange from Svea Court of Appeal.pic.twitter.com/z53LuQmLBb
-
@swedenvsassange@Alfreddezayas A. Court also writes Assange can leave Embassy whenever he wants&it is not detention-based on ECtHR case law -
@Klamberg@Alfreddezayas UN experts considered & rejected this. Extensive ECHR caselaw supports#Assange paras 35-49 https://justice4assange.com/IMG/pdf/assange-wgad.pdf … -
@swedenvsassange@Alfreddezayas in which para do UNWGAD mention and discuss the fact that Assange entered the Embassy voluntarily? -
@Klamberg@Alfreddezayas Assange exercises fundamental right to seek asylum. UK spends $20m encircling embassy, Sweden acting arbitrarily. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@swedenvsassange@UNHumanRights@Alfreddezayas the Supreme Court ruled that the Prosecutor should seek alternatives 1/2Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.