@swedenvsassange @_ElizabethD and that's one element of various strands of the majority in Assange. It was not determinative of itself.
@_ElizabethD @trewloy It's Bucnys (Nov 2013, a year after the Assange judgment), para 36: https://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2012_0245_Judgment.pdf …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@swedenvsassange @_ElizabethD and a five judge decision can't overturn a seven judge decision. -
@trewloy @_ElizabethD Wrong.Two already ruled in his favour. Three of the remaining 5 ruled against based on an erroneous legal argument.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@swedenvsassange @_ElizabethD and the whole judgment is careful to stress that the rule for the prosecutor from Assange decision is notThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@swedenvsassange @_ElizabethD challenged. It's uncomfortable for you, but it's basic principles of stare decisis and ratio decidendiThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.