@JackofKent @wikileaks Agenda so closely tied to blindly defending Assange at all costs it discredits their other work. Shame.
-
-
Replying to @LukeBurstow
.
@LukeBurstow@JackofKent Leave your anti-Assange cul-de-sac behind and defend his right to equality before the law. https://justice4assange.com/Cambridge-Union-Statement-Fact.html …1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
@swedenvsassange@JackofKent in not anti Assange, I'm pro not running away from rape allegations.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LukeBurstow
@LukeBurstow@JackofKent Then defend his right to be heard and to be treated like everyone else. Sweden questioned 44 ppl in UK since 2010.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
@swedenvsassange@JackofKent I think he's wrong, you think he's right, we won't agree on this.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LukeBurstow
@LukeBurstow@JackofKent Difference is I have the Swedish Supreme Court on my side: prosecutor was wrong to refuse to question for 5 years.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
@swedenvsassange@JackofKent I've been quite clear, I think he's wrong to behave how he did. Quote what you like, my opinion won't change.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LukeBurstow
@LukeBurstow@JackofKent behave how, exactly? The woman says she wasn't raped and the police made up the allegations in order to 'grab' him.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AssangeLegal
@swedenvsassange@JackofKent as I said, we'll never agree. Best leave it here, I think.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@LukeBurstow @JackofKent I am not seeking disagreement. You can attack him if you want, but the moral thing to do is defend his basic rights
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.