Good news, everyone. @ggreenwald now acknowledges that Russian military may very well have hacked their way into DNC assets and that the huge preponderance of evidence to this effect isn't just some deep state psyop. Our long national nightmare is over. Good night and good luck.
-
-
Barret Brown hasn't been the same after prison. Seen this with others. Look at The Guardian, it was never same after UK Govt smashed it's computer servers. Looks like trade off was made.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
why is this on my feed i dont give a shit anymore people are hungry
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You three stooges are guilty of 9/11. You know we know that. FULL STORY: http://AssangeShow.com
#JulianAssange#WikiLeaks#Assangepic.twitter.com/LFFcrfSbj2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A Journalist/Lawyer I know concedes zero evidence of any collusion/crime, yet demands MSM avenge Benghazi lies of Fox News (by practicing similarly bad journalism against Trump). Then, he denied his own testimony, and finds Trump guilty using evidence Mueller has yet to reveal.
-
I laughed. Mueller has yet to reveal plaster casts of Bigfoot, ergo it exists! Actually, he desperately wants revenge for Ken Starr. WJC "only lied about sex" he constantly laments (unable to process both impeachment and the contempt finding of Fed Judge Susan Webber Wright).
-
This inability to process WJC's wrongdoing is a product of extensive character flaws, but it is the argument this lawyer constantly wages (persuading no reasonable juror). The more you refute, the more he relies on partisan attacks (you must be a Trumper to ask him for evidence).
-
If you want to argue Russian Collusion with a Democrat, lie them down on a couch and discuss their feeling about Monica Lewinsky. At the core of the argument is a desire to disrespect certain women, without consequence.
-
Challenge the lunacy of their guilt-by-association assertions, and they often prove unable to overcome the binary world-view of a partisan dupe (you must be pro-Trump). This one was furious Trump wouldn't properly honor McCain -- a hero who was his Trump just eight years prior.
-
Eight years from now, Trump may well be his hero, if MSM spoonfeeds him that narrative (and if it produces a false sense of personal revenge against Monica). He'll be his own pro-Trump enemy. And this is an educated lawyer who appreciates how the Clintons betrayed DEM ideals.
-
What would it take to convince this partisan lawyer to set aside the desires of his inner child, and objectively weigh the evidence in this matter? NASA wouldn't accept such a mission. Why should we? If they insist on spoonfeeding off MSM's bullshit, isolate from the zombies.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.