"If Assange Leaves the Ecuadorian Embassy, What Next?," by Hilary Hurdhttps://www.lawfareblog.com/if-assange-leaves-ecuadorian-embassy-what-next …
-
-
restored and he should be compensated by Sweden and the UK: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Detention/DraftBasicPrinciples/March2015/WGAD.CRP.1.2015.pdf …. Sweden did not appeal the decision. The UK applied for the decision to be reviewed, but lost in late 2016. The second decision is by the Interamerican Court on Human Rights, which is a seminal...
-
decision concerning the nature and scope of asylum in international law, and will have a significant impact on the interpretation in law of Mr. Assange's international protection. http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/comunicados/cp_28_18_eng.pdf … Julian Assange's situation in the embassy has been widely reported to be...
-
"internet cut off" but this is a gross understatement of the situation: he has been refused access to visitors and jammers have been installed inside the embassy to prevent phone signals and internet access, a situation Dinah PoKempner (
@HRW's General Counsel) has likened to.... -
solitary confinement: https://twitter.com/DinahPoKempner/status/980623189263966209 …. It is a situation eight years in the making and more information is coming out as time goes on. Recently, The Guardian reported the UK's role in prolonging Mr. Assange's confinement in the embassy: the UK Crown Prosecution Service...
-
The Guardian revealed CPS pressured Sweden into reversing its decision into closing the Assange investigation in 2013: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/feb/11/sweden-tried-to-drop-assange-extradition-in-2013-cps-emails-show …. They also exposed CPS engaged in an extraordinary perversion of the course of justice destroying key documentshttps://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/nov/10/uk-prosecutors-admit-destroying-key-emails-from-julian-assange-case …
-
The exculpatory SMS messages came to light in 2016 from the phone of the woman where she said she "felt railroaded by police and others" who "made up the charges" and "wanted to get Assange", and she "didn't want to accuse him of anything". The details of the case are fascinating
-
and it is encouraging to see people developing expertise in this case as more and more information is set to come to light. I hope many people will be inspired to look into the detail of this deeply politicised case and its many irregularities. More: see http://justice4assange.com
-
What a pity that
@AssangeLegal has taken so much time to help inform@lawfareblog but they have not even bothered to edit their article. Clearly not a source that can be trusted.https://twitter.com/lawfareblog/status/1026141028582137856 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.