HAHAHAHAHA It's HILARIOUS when Wikileaks goes full anti-transparency when Trump could be damaged. How anyone can morally support these pack of hacks is beyond me.https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1021935655574810624 …
-
-
Btw I see that the link attached to your Twitter handle is justice4assange. What's your role in that?
-
If you can read my profile, you can read my role.
-
So you're chief cheerleader for Assange? And my "assumptions" - which by the way were conclusions that I don't usually talk about – are up for questioning? When is he coming out of the embassy?
-
Your assumption you wrote yourself 'narrow definition of what constitutes the press'. Well, your courts have made that clear. He is a journalist. I call out bullshit and contrast them with facts. So in that sense, I am a chief cheerleader of the truth. What are you cheerleading?
-
Not by my definition. I'm genuinely curious about what would motivate someone to attach themself to his cause. Was it the rape accusations? The cowardice? The abusing of hospitality? Is this something you aspire to?
-
I see we are in the realm of the subjective now. Thanks for clarifying that. It's very satisfying to debunk such smears with court filings and other official documents. You should try primary source material sometime.
-
Julian Assange deserves first amendment protections under US law. He's also a partisan hack who no moral compass who believes that radical transparency is only fit for his political opponents, and he enables white nationalists around the world.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is *about* Wikileaks. It's about him.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.