On what charge?
-
-
The courts should count the 6 years, not least because the UN has ruled so. But to count that would be mean UK courts having to acknowledge they've kept him in arbitrary detention during all this time. It's moot anyway, because he served all the time before entering the embassy.
-
Ridiculous. He has been free to leave at any time. Any imprisonment is of his own making.
-
You could say that about an open prison. You’re really not good at being objective are you.
-
A ridiculous analogy.
-
Free to leave only to be instantly arrested and most likely handed to the Americans to spend decades in isolation whilst they drag out the slowest possible case against him for exposing illegal mass surveillance? A ridiculous definition of “free”.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.