In swipe at Clinton, Sessions cited material hacked by WikiLeaks. Was that okay?https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-swipe-at-clinton-sessions-cites-material-hacked-by-wikileaks-was-that-okay/2018/06/29/b388c7ec-7bd1-11e8-80be-6d32e182a3bc_story.html …
-
-
Replying to @mattzap
@michaelscherer Please correct the headline of your article published by the "Washington Post Organisation". There is no allegation, by the DoJ or anyone else that it "hacked" anything. WikiLeaks is not a "group", no more than the Washington Post is. WikiLeaks is a publication.1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes
Why is @WashingtonPost adopting language that threatens media workers and freedom of the press more broadly?
WikiLeaks doesn't have "members", it has staff. This language is not only inaccurate, it appears disturbingly reminiscent of terms used to describe terrorist organisations
8:38 AM - 30 Jun 2018
0 replies
14 retweets
21 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.