“IBM contributed to the holocaust” was a rather abstract bad thing for me until I read this thread & started to understand that it was deliberate and profitable and _crucial_ to the Nazi’s machinery of death. More info: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dehomag https://twitter.com/perplamps/status/1038103949956460544 …
Track people how? By scanning their gacebook posts and analyzing their selfies? The most they could do is use computers to store the details of their victims, count them, and split them to groups. They didn't even have databases then!
-
-
And as for IBM responsibility - evil states and organizations acquire and use commercial technologies for their crimes. Sometimes the companies know and don't care, sometimes they don't. Holding them responsible shouldn't be done lightly.
-
To hold IBM responsible you should make the case that: 1. IBM knew the purpose of their computers and supported it. 2. They had a choice in that matter. 3. The computers were required for the extermination.
-
Considering their technology, their trains and gas cannisters were far more important.
-
Last thing: You judge those who cooperated with the nazis by todays knowledge. Then, they thought of the nazis as just another racist imperialists state
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.