The focus on logical fallacies is a weird part of the pedagogy of philosophy. Teaching people how to attack an argument (often poorly) before teaching them how to construct arguments.
-
-
if true it just means I will literally invest in creating cyborgbrains that don't have intuitions there are books like "Philosophy without intuitions" with the entire opposite thesis, but my usb died and I don't enjoy re-highlighting stuff soon so I stopped reading it
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.