If there's no known political objective, an attack, no matter how "terrifying," is not terrorism. How do we not get that by now?
Näytä tämä ketju
-
I second Nick. As I said, then it becomes a hate crime, regardless of number of casualties. The problem is the agenda behind terror coverage
I think it is states' imposition to the people; If criminal's motivation would be to hinder the all music concerts, would it be terrorism?
-
-
Perhaps. But terror isn't the defining factor. Bank robberies are terrifying, but not terrorism.
-
The definition and media coverage of terrorism is heavily politicised globally. The agenda behind these two needs deconstructing.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.