If there's no known political objective, an attack, no matter how "terrifying," is not terrorism. How do we not get that by now?
Näytä tämä ketju
If his motivation is ideological hate, it can be defined as terrorism; the definition of lone wolf eases / glosses over the those evil
-
-
There needs to be a political goal. Serial killers and schoolyard massacres involve plenty of deaths, but not terrorism.
-
We don't need to know the political objective or intentions of the perpetrator. His action has terrorized ppl.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I second Nick. As I said, then it becomes a hate crime, regardless of number of casualties. The problem is the agenda behind terror coverage
-
It's also sensationalism, emotion and the hijacking of a term that used to be used more responsibly.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.