Article 26 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties exemplifies this principle as follows: “Every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed in good faith”. #RolandGarros
Näytä tämä ketju
Are the UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) decisions binding?
Every state party to ICCPR & its Optional Protocol is bound by their provisions & the findings of the HRC, under the fundamental and peremptory principle of international law: pacta sunt servanda. #NeverEnough
-
-
-
According to General Comment 33 of HRC, decisions issued by the HRC under the Optional Protocol exhibit characteristics of a judicial decision, moreover they are determinative with regard to interpretation of ICCPR
#DenkliğimiVerYÖKNäytä tämä ketju -
@VeniceComm opted that
Implementation of int'l HRs treaties is a task for all national authorities,
decisions of the UN treaty bodies are more than mere recommendations,
member states are under the obligation to take the HRC’s decisions into consideration in good faith.Näytä tämä ketju -
States may not invoke their domestic law as a justification for not complying with their obligations under international law; on the contrary, States have to ensure that their domestic law is in conformity with their international legal obligations. (Art. 27 VCLT)
Näytä tämä ketju -
In 2018, the Spanish Supreme Court has established that the views/decision adopted by UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies in individual complaints are binding on the State.pic.twitter.com/EaYAaGqK0p
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.