Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Report on Turkish Criminal Peace Judgeships and international law by @ICJ_org and @ihop_tr:
1) The system of the criminal peace judges in Turkey does not meet international standards for independent and impartial review of detention. @freejudgeseu @platformpj @yargiicinadaletpic.twitter.com/3BpGVAdYul
2) The body in charge of appointment and dismissal of the peace judges, the Council of Judges and Prosecutors, falls short of the international and regional standards pertaining to the independence of the judiciary, in particular in its structural dimension.
3) Reliable reports, including from international organisations suggest that, in practice, the method of selection of and decisions by peace judges show a situation of lack of institutional independence and leave room for pressures from political branches of the State.
4) As identified by several international bodies, the closed appeal/opposition system in its structure and in its actual operation, does not mitigate this lack of independence but, rather, compounds it.
5) In the view of the ICJ, these factors call into question the independence and capacity of judges of the peace to judicially review restrictions on the right to liberty under articles 5.3 and 5.4 ECHR and 9.3 and 9.4 ICCPR.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
