U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
A lot of people have compared the new coronavirus to the flu. The flu is bad! What you don't want is for the coronavirus to become just like it -- and there are reasons to worry:https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-01-29/viral-sweet-spot-raises-fears-coronavirus-will-be-hard-to-stop …
The flu is a contagious respiratory disease that's mild in most. It spread around the world, and does so every year, for just that reason. This new coronavirus is a lot like that. Mild in most, contagious, and highly capable of spread.
But unlike the flu, we don't have a vaccine, we don't have well-studied therapeutic treatments, and it's hitting new populations with no known exposure/immunity to it.
The worry, according to the experts we spoke to, is that this new coronavirus is in a "sweet spot" for transmission. That's why global public health officials are taking the aggressive steps against it. The flu is bad. You don't want Flu 2.
Ebola is scary (really, really scary)! But it typically burns out before it can go truly big/global.
Where is the 2% number from? Is it the calculation based off of confirmed cases vs confirmed dead? Or a source that explicitly said they had observed and tracked a group of infected folks and this was the % mortality rate? Because these are two different things.
It's in the very top of our story; about 2% of confirmed cases: "The new coronavirus that originated in the Chinese city of Wuhan appears far less fatal, with about 2% of the 6,000 confirmed cases dying."
Somebody should tell Chinese people that spitting and blowing mucus from their noses onto public walkways, and coughing and sneezing without covering their mouths is rude and unsanitary.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
