We are 
Wouldn't be better for ESA to just use cheaper @SpaceX Falcon 9/Heavy or @RocketLab Electron ?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Une Energia pouvait mettre la même chose en un seul tir!pic.twitter.com/7jLgcbmUE1
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Meanwhile Arianespace has obsolete technology and will be propped up by taxpayers paying above the odds for government satellite launches.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or almost 4-5 launchers in 2018.. Meanwhile spacex was more than 20. What is the most important ?
-
Back in 2018, SpaceX lifted more than 90 metric tons payload into space (top secret Zuma & Musk's Tesla Roadster excluded.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I know that is quite an achviement but I can help myself to compare it to Saturn V, proposed N1 and Energia... Of course these were build for entire different purposes and the tech was different but still... Fascinating payloads cqpacity back then
-
But still inredibly proude of
@ArianeGroup as being an European
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Houps, yesterday a claim letter from Musk, dated December, was disclosed showing that in fact average price of Falcon 9 is from the beginning 50% more expensive than Ariane 5 ($120m each F9 for half carriage of each A5 at $180m including public money) !!
-
Can't believe... any sources please?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
ArianeS! One Ariane 5 per launch to be true...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.