. Original of course contemptuously assumed reports were lies or products of anti-#windenergy mind control.
Conversation
Again, why would you resort to doctoring a graphic without declaring your intent or the intent of the original? Pretty devious
1
. Wasn't your intent to present anecdotal reports of WTS? This version does not change that.
2
My intent was to demonstrate logical fallacy. The quotes delineated that, and you have removed them. That is unethical.
1
1
So why doctor someone else's work without permission or declaration? Does that seem like an adult thing to do?
1
It seems appropriate to the original.
1
In what way was my original graphic equivalent to stealing, doctoring and misappropriating someone else's work?
1
~ Did you ask the people who had reported the symptoms about how you were going to use them?
1
Replying to
So you do that through plagiarism, misrepresentation and deception? There's no merit in being conniving and manipulative.
Replying to
~ Again, did you ask the people whose reports you used if they were OK with your treatment of them?
1
No. Did you, when you published your version?
1
Show replies