@aeris22 @rafi0t @financialombuds Could see how it'd be less secure than regular PGP but better than nothing maybe?
-
-
Replying to @Arcadian_O
@Arcadian_O@rafi0t@financialombuds Or worse in case of «contractual» relation, how manage inexistence of security boundary on PGP/inline?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aeris22
@Arcadian_O@rafi0t@financialombuds Eg I can send you a signed content, but nothing than the first letter of the content is really signed1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aeris22
@Arcadian_O@rafi0t@financialombuds Or worse as demonstrated here : https://dkg.fifthhorseman.net/notes/inline-pgp-harmful/ … […]1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aeris22
@Arcadian_O@rafi0t@financialombuds You can sign something which display different content depending display context… […]1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aeris22
@Arcadian_O@rafi0t@financialombuds Can be demoniac for serious commercial contractual communication… :D2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aeris22
@aeris22@Arcadian_O@financialombuds well, don't forget that the alternative is plain text mails.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rafi0t
@rafi0t@Arcadian_O@financialombuds No, alternative is « mail must just die for serious critical com’ » :D4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aeris22
@aeris22@rafi0t@financialombuds would be absolute pain. I wouldn't have gone to them if they didn't use emails 2/21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Arcadian_O
@Arcadian_O@rafi0t@financialombuds I totally agree with that assertion. But in this case, what is the real purpose of GPG ?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@aeris22 @rafi0t @financialombuds If it's a little safer than plain text I am already happy.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.