So relieved to see Labour adopting IHRA definition. But seriously for what other forms of racism would Labour be debating "accompanying free speech remarks" for hours? Why do we need a caveat on hate speech?
-
-
Replying to @Arcadian_O
for the same reason that the black lives matter people keep getting their accounts suspended by bad faith reports from white supremacists
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @smithsam
My tweet was poorly worded. There is room for the debate "is hate speech/free speech/can violent views be expressed." But here we're talking about an anti-racist party claiming that a group can't define what is racism to them, there needs to be a caveat to their definition
1:25 PM - 4 Sep 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.