6th Circuit says its the first appeals court to sustain 2 Amend challenge to federal firearms regulation since Heller http://1.usa.gov/1z1lI5c
-
-
Replying to @KimberlyRobinsn
6th Circuit also appears to be second circuit court (after the 9th) to use Kozinski's term "dissental"
1 reply 4 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KimberlyRobinsn
.
@KimberlyRobinsn Oh no, I was hoping that virus had been contained.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AppellateDaily
I take it you dissental from that term
@AppellateDaily ?1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @KimberlyRobinsn
@KimberlyRobinsn Fan of Kozinski, but not dissental.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AppellateDaily
.
@AppellateDaily@KimberlyRobinsn@JoshMBlackman Is there a catchy Kozinski-ism for a judge's dissent from a court's denial of a petition?1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @JusticeWillett
.
@JusticeWillett@KimberlyRobinsn@JoshMBlackman Yes, it's "dissental." http://bit.ly/1v4GnE22 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AppellateDaily
@AppellateDaily@KimberlyRobinsn@JoshMBlackman Would "dissental" fit a dissent from a discretionary-review court's refusal to hear a case?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@JusticeWillett @KimberlyRobinsn @JoshMBlackman "Dissental" refers to dissent from denial of rehearing en banc, as Kozinski defines it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.