@AppellateDaily I'm skeptical: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/06/26/are-jones-and-riley-explained-by-the-justices-imagining-themselves-as-targets/ … @UCILaw
-
-
-
I think familiarity (or not) with the technology did play a significant role in Aero and cell phone cases. RT
@OrinKerr@AppellateDaily -
@espinsegall@OrinKerr@AppellateDaily Agree--also think that explains MD v. King. Weren't so clear on what the potential harm was. -
@espinsegall Apropos of King, today the VT SCT said arrestee DNA sampling violates VT right to privacy http://www.sfgate.com/news/crime/article/Vermont-court-No-DNA-collection-until-conviction-5614992.php …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Obvious. MT
@AppellateDaily: Chemsky: If SCOTUS justices can imagine search happening to them, it won't pass muster (they have cell phones).Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Their law clerks do. “
@AppellateDaily: If Justices can imagine search happening to them, it won't pass muster (e.g., they have cell phones).Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.