-
-
Replying to @AppellateDaily
@AppellateDaily If the latter, what would that mean to all the stays?1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @indianalawblog
.
@indianalawblog If latter, perhaps#SCOTUS wanted to let things play out in circuits? Their stay in UT#SSM case only thru CA10 decision.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @AppellateDaily
.
@indianalawblog Of course, subsequently CA10 went ahead and stayed its decision pending#SCOTUS review.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AppellateDaily
@AppellateDaily@indianalawblog I assume that stay would vanish if SCOTUS were to deny cert.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @JoeDunman
@JoeDunman @indianalawblog I agree, though prob with formality of asking CA10 to lift.
8:17 AM - 10 Jul 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.