@AppellateDaily If the latter, what would that mean to all the stays?
-
-
-
.
@indianalawblog If latter, perhaps#SCOTUS wanted to let things play out in circuits? Their stay in UT#SSM case only thru CA10 decision. -
.
@indianalawblog Of course, subsequently CA10 went ahead and stayed its decision pending#SCOTUS review. -
@AppellateDaily@indianalawblog I assume that stay would vanish if SCOTUS were to deny cert. -
@JoeDunman@indianalawblog I agree, though prob with formality of asking CA10 to lift.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@AppellateDaily I do not think I have ever heard a more beautiful expression that "essence of Windsor." We should market it as a perfume! -
@kaplanrobbie@AppellateDaily We'd repurpose this classic ad, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7F-dulMPmk …, w/same-sex couple ("Your Windsor stays on my mind"). -
.
@20002ist@kaplanrobbie Haven't seen that ad in eons! That's exactly it, "Your Windsor stays on my mind." http://bit.ly/1xhp3hh#SCOTUS
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@AppellateDaily#SCOTUS#SSM "Essence of Windsor" -- love that!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@AppellateDaily I think you might be right. There is almost sure to be a cir split (5th looking at you) if they wait.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.