...Would love to know the backstory.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He is likely the most anti-science judge? IUD's do not, never, no way, equal abortions. RT
@AppellateDaily -
@espinsegall@AppellateDaily While you're right - do you want the Court judging what part of religion is "correct" and what's not? -
That's fair but there has to be some limit otherwise what's difference b/t religion and Santa Clause/Tooth Fairy?RT
@kkaplan@AppellateDaily -
@espinsegall@AppellateDaily Many would argue that all religion is a fiction, yet there it is - protected in two ways in our founding doc. -
One problem is a religious corp- aka, "people my friend" trumps the worldview of biological humans.
@kkaplan@espinsegall@AppellateDaily -
@grimcity@espinsegall@AppellateDaily Blame the dictionary act. There's not much you can do when the law defines a corp as a person. -
Agreed about the corps are people idiocy, but we've effectively said that "corp faith" > human's.
@kkaplan@espinsegall@AppellateDaily
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@AppellateDaily I said this yesterday, but, to me, J. Alito's Hosanna-Tabor concurrence indicates this is an issue he's interested inThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@AppellateDaily Or maybe Roberts knew the result would be politically charged and didn't want to have his fingerprints on it. Not his issue.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@AppellateDaily in HT he wrote broadly and indicated religious rights were something he was passionate about. Maybe impacted assignment?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.