Likewise, Judge Niemeyer said Loving was "irrelevant" and gave an extended statement about man-woman marriage, during Ted Olson's segment.
-
-
Replying to @AppellateDaily
Did he cite the Bible? RT
@AppellateDaily: Niemeyer said Loving was "irrelevant" and gave extended statement about man-woman marriage ...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @AppellateDaily
Don't suppose he cited the words "equal," "person," and "laws" in 14th Amendment either? RT
@AppellateDaily2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @espinsegall
@espinsegall More likely to be Judge Gregory citing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AppellateDaily
Just suggesting denying a gay "person" "equal" rights to marry under "laws" presents starightforward violation of EP text.RT@AppellateDaily
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @espinsegall
@espinsegall Definitely, I was following you; Gregory and Niemeyer coming at issue from different angles.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AppellateDaily
I know you did. Just trying to point out again that if judges were serious about text, these cases would actually be easy.RT@AppellateDaily
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
.@espinsegall Will be interesting to see how this comes out (Floyd pretty quiet); though, of course, all roads lead to #SCOTUS & mainly AMK.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.