Next week, each night M-F, @CSPAN is going to air a notable #SCOTUS argument from this term, http://bit.ly/PVwYRn
@espinsegall @cspan Funny you should mention that, Eric, because I did think twice about which word to use.
-
-
Didn't mean to be snide but the whole camera thing is just so indefensible that it makes me nuts. RT
@AppellateDaily@cspan -
@espinsegall Eric-Hope you are sitting down, but I was in courtroom last night for a lecture. No pics, even for that (exc hist soc photog). -
Finishing book on Supreme Court transparency, I've become convinced they think they have to be mysterious and removed. Sad.
@AppellateDaily -
@espinsegall@AppellateDaily I would love to watch SCOTUS oral arguments, but I don't think the prohibition of cameras is "indefensible." -
The arguments (and decision days) are public, C-Span wants to televise, what justification can there be? RT
@JudgeDillard@AppellateDaily -
@espinsegall@AppellateDaily My primary concern would be the media using video clips of oral argument out of context. -
21st century democracy.
@JudgeDillard:@AppellateDaily My primary concern would be media using video clips of oral argument out of context -
@espinsegall@AppellateDaily I would love to see it happen. But I disagree that the policy is "indefensible" just because you don't like it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.