SCOTUS Deletes Audio of Protestor From Arguments: Yesterday, after the audio of the Octane Fitness, LLC v. Ico... http://bit.ly/1kC8uGB
-
-
Replying to @kedarbhatia
@Dailywrit I suppose that is possible. It was also cut out of the transcript (a court reporter would usually note a disruption in Court)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kedarbhatia
@Dailywrit I’m pretty sure the transcripts are recorded in real time.. Not sure scotus policy@AppellateDaily1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kedarbhatia
@Dailywrit@AppellateDaily You can hear protestor in Gonzales v. Carhart loud and clear (see update) http://joshblackman.com/blog/2014/03/01/scotus-deletes-audio-of-protestor-from-arguments/ …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JoshMBlackman
@JoshMBlackman@Dailywrit One diff bw Carhart & this week's arg is that#SCOTUS only released audio once a year then, not a few days later.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AppellateDaily
@AppellateDaily@Dailywrit Yes, I noted that in the post. People weren’t paying attention back then1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@JoshMBlackman @Dailywrit Super, I'll go back and take a look.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.