@AppellateDaily @lawhistory @derektmuller Unlikely the Court will see it this way (esp since CNN is now running with it) cc @JoshMBlackman
.@lawhistory @derektmuller Could be or maybe letting @CSPAN in might take challenge away from this kind of escapade. Protester? Mute button.
-
-
-
@rbphillipsjr@lawhistory@derektmuller@JoshMBlackman CNN is running with clandestine video. Non-clandestine video? A yawner. -
@AppellateDaily@lawhistory@derektmuller@JoshMBlackman But Ct worries abt ppl playing to camera - now it looks like "I rise" was just that -
@rbphillipsjr@lawhistory@derektmuller@JoshMBlackman CSPAN cameras not aimed at gallery. Protesters could be muted. -
@AppellateDaily@lawhistory@derektmuller@JoshMBlackman BTW I think there should be cameras, but I think this stuff sets the cause back -
@rbphillipsjr@lawhistory@derektmuller@JoshMBlackman Definitely, I follow you, Rich; several ways to see it. -
@AppellateDaily@lawhistory@derektmuller@JoshMBlackman Michelle you make some great points; but I'm afraid the Ct will not see it that way -
@rbphillipsjr@lawhistory@derektmuller@JoshMBlackman Now, if justices could be cited for "harangues," we would never see cameras. :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.