Trying to figure out what a private company’s platform has anything to do with free speech.pic.twitter.com/WvqxIDMoRj
-
-
please dont say stupid shit. let me spell it out for ya: IT'S DISCRIMINATION AND THAT IS ILLEGAL OR AT LEAST IMMORAL! PEOPLE HAVE TO FIGHT BACK. IF A PRIVATE COMPANY WERE TO KICK BLACK PEOPLE OUT OR GAYS SIMPLY FOR WHO THEY ARE, THAT COMPANY COULD BE SHUT DOWN OR SUED.pic.twitter.com/eC77HHwxv3
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Furthermore, YouTube is an online forum for people to post their ideas and expression of opinions. Them blocking certain ppl is not what they said. No one will get to hear the other side's point of view. If enough companies like YT do this, the other side dies out. Wake up dude.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Comparing political opinion and things like religion or race is probably the most moronic thing I’ve ever heard. Sure YouTube has a transparency issue but your reaction I replied to was the kind of overboard bullshit you’d hear on infowars.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
dude fuck you you puppet idiot. If your too stupid and child minded to see that people are being discriminated against in a public forum then you do not need to speak to me. please go ask your mom for permission before you get back on the computer.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Didn't see this reply until now. I didn't say they weren't being discriminated against, it's pretty clear twitter has an agenda. I'm saying they're not breaking any laws or in any sort of legal wrongdoing situation. Opinions and political stances arent protected on a private site
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's still discrimination. And we should push to make it a law. This isn't a pay to join site; it's open to the public. Therefore, it should be treated just like a physical public place. It saddens me you aren't willing to fight bigotry and discrimination.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I’m not sure you know what a private company means if you think it requires a pay to join function. Also why would stances or opinions ever be considered a protected class? I’m all for open dialogue and people being able to speak. But twitter/YouTube are private entities.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And you also stand for censorship. And lies. They claim someone speaking a different point of view is violent hate speech. Again, you're missing a good bit of my point.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don’t approve of what they’re doing, no. So I don’t. But they have the right to do it. They’re a private company. It does suck but it’s how free speech laws work.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
No, they don't. Or at least they shouldn't. We have to fight to change that. Just idly standing by going "Well it's they're right" is wrong. That's akin to people despising slavery in the 1800s but saying "well, it's they're right"..
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.