“Unlike Facebook, Telegram is a valid and appropriate place to organize an ethnic cleansing” is a *very* spicy take, Willhttps://twitter.com/willcarless/status/1125777869991550977 …
-
I didn’t say it was better. I said it’s fundamentally different I don’t agree with what these people are saying on any platform. But I’m not sure I agree with completely banning them from communicating, either
(1) Do you use Telegram? Because you don’t understand how it works. These are PUBLIC groups that work pretty much like Facebook pages. (2) Even if what you are claiming is true, why do you think a particular platform is obligated to help the them organize an ethnic cleansing?
-
-
Don’t put words in my mouth. I didn’t say platforms are obligated to help people organize ethnic cleansing, dude. I believe, as I have said, that tech companies have the right to decide who to host/platform. That’s their right. If Telegram wants to ban these folks, ok
-
This might be a surprise to you as a writer, Will, but words have meaning, and you said it would be “fundamentally wrong” for Telegram to deplatform people planning an ethnic cleansing of the United States. That suggests that platforms *do* have an obligation to platform them.pic.twitter.com/7k5ga46oeX
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.