If you’ve got a few extra dollars, please consider donating them to Chelsea Manning’s legal fund. 
https://actionnetwork.org/fundraising/chelsea-manning-needs-legal-funds-to-resist-a-grand-jury-subpoena …
-
-
Replying to @AntiFashGordon
I have a hard time giving her the benefit of the doubt on these. And Wikileaks is not exactly on the up and up. I don’t know, man.pic.twitter.com/XEMnwWaLKt
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SurprisedFace
AntiFash Gordon Retweeted AntiFash Gordon
This exchange might provide a little more context for you.https://twitter.com/antifashgordon/status/1101656168064258048?s=21 …
AntiFash Gordon added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AntiFashGordon
I get that stance but I have a hard time reconciling not only her associations, which strike me as more than questionable, but also the coincidence of sending the into to Wikileaks of all places.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SurprisedFace @AntiFashGordon
Like I’m not a russiagate conspiracy theorist by any means but the weaponizing if Wikileaks by Russia is basically a known fact. It’s why Snowden hides there Add that to those associations and her reasoning strikes me as a convenient excuse.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SurprisedFace @AntiFashGordon
I am highly skeptical of the idea that she associated with them for intel. She’s not exactly a secret figure and those people aren’t exactly brilliant minds that require a spy. I dunno man.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You should probably read about her before disparaging her while she’s facing a threat from the state? Like, did you know that she approached the Washington Post and the New York Times before going to WikiLeaks? They weren’t her first choice.pic.twitter.com/gbxLWqVXmb
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.