Let's remember that the state is responsible for not just the violence that it directly commits, but for the violence that it tolerates, as well. So when the police don't investigate reports of sexual assault, the state is tacitly legitimizing that violence. https://twitter.com/katiejmbaker/status/1043226600085417984 …
-
-
As we see from national numbers across five different sites, between 80-90% of sexual assault cases THAT WERE REPORTED TO THE POLICE were never charged or even referred for prosecution.pic.twitter.com/HupqwwGyiO
Show this thread -
And this is absolutely by design. Whenever you bring up abolishing the police, people say, "But what about rapists and child molesters?" But so what? The police already aren't dealing with them. This is *exactly* why we need strong and local community defense organizations.
Show this thread -
Remember that the state does not tolerate any violence that does not serve the state, or challenges the state in any way. So when there are mass crimes going unpunished, when sexual predators are allowed to walk free, that is directly serving the repressive goals of the state.
Show this thread -
So there's no divide between those who want the police abolished and those who want to see sexual predators face accountability. Without facing the violence of the state for challenging its legitimacy, communities would be free to confront sexual predators themselves.
Show this thread -
The goals of police and prison abolition and confronting sexual violence are the same thing. As long as the police have a monopoly on violence, there's no chance we can adequately confront sexual predators.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.