It leaves next gen in the position we are currently where the grubbyness of society has normalised immoral behaviour and archaic legislation with underfunded police means that the complainants don't get the chance to PROVE they are 'victims' or not as investigations don't happen.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Ok so back to your-they shouldn't be allowed to be called victims until the perp is found guilty.My case is a lawyer that created an entire fake ID to groom and exploit women for sex through online dating. He knew how to stay on the right side of current legislation for fraud.1/2
In that he didn't ask for money but had much from all of us. He has been doing this for at least a decade with the same alias, I am currently 1/11. This type of case hasn't been tried before. Does his lies/deceit abuse mean he's innocent because no historic cases to try against?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Just because there is no law (potentially) to prosecute against does not mean what he does/is doing is 'lawful'. it doesn't mean his victims should be categorised as complainants when we have multiple victim evidence against him, and he has used his legal background to assist?
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
BUT there are too many cases because of legislative loop holes (and nothing more) that keep them out of court, so why should those abusers be allowed to carry on/walk away and leave the 'victims' in a worse place themselves?
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.