Gotta love ex husbands & naïve ex wives: ExH: “Yes, I got a bonus & redundancy payment but they are NOT income; they are just like winning the lottery so I don’t have to give you any for child maintenance” ExW: “Oh, okay” Needless to say I shall now be assisting this lady
-
With repsect i do understand the system and have read the legislation. Justify this. Parents earn the same income, £x. They decide to split but will share the children 60/40. Both parents need at least a two bed home, food, clothes and money for the children. With maintenance and
1/ With all due respect, tax credits are not maintenance which we were discussing. Currently maintenance favours the father in most cases. What is archaic is that ( in most cases) the farther is allowed to deduct money from his earning to cover the cost of a new partners children
-
-
Even when those children are receiving maintenance from their own father. Until the CSA was changed those children also received a higher percentage of the NRP income than their own child. This is wrong. It was changed after consultation to nearly equal but still benefits...
-
The children in new household marginally. If they receive money from their own NRP it should not be an option to claim against own child’s maintenance. Again, responsibility is equal for parents. Income is irrelevant.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.