In a legal first in the U.K. ‘The prosecutor convinced the jury that sex obtained through deception is not true consent.’: https://reason.com/2019/09/25/u-k-trial-court-lying-about-vasectomy-negates-consent-to-sex/ … @HWistrich @bindelj are we getting there 
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Marriage by itself has been seen as not effective to vitiate consent, the same goes for deception about wealth. But a judge has stated that all else should be looked at with a broad common sense approach. Issue surrounds lack of guidelines so ‘new’ behaviours r not being tested.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AnnaRowe123 @JJMLondon and
@cpsuk have until this case only been guided by current case law which means that new deceptions are not even being tried by juries as they don’t get to court. New behaviours MUST be tested as many abusers are walking without consequence.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I’ve read a case involving religion where there was a conviction in another country.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.