In a legal first in the U.K. ‘The prosecutor convinced the jury that sex obtained through deception is not true consent.’: https://reason.com/2019/09/25/u-k-trial-court-lying-about-vasectomy-negates-consent-to-sex/ … @HWistrich @bindelj are we getting there 
Marriage by itself has been seen as not effective to vitiate consent, the same goes for deception about wealth. But a judge has stated that all else should be looked at with a broad common sense approach. Issue surrounds lack of guidelines so ‘new’ behaviours r not being tested.
-
-
@cpsuk have until this case only been guided by current case law which means that new deceptions are not even being tried by juries as they don’t get to court. New behaviours MUST be tested as many abusers are walking without consequence. -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It’s true but there are things that are minimal for example age and height or weight. These are not going to harm anyone in the long run and can be visually ‘seen’ by the other party before any intimate behaviour happens. Maybe called ‘passive lies’
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.