-
-
Questions on there that will not be answered I’m sure. If they do have assets, sure it’s s possibility to cease them and sell them off to auction to get as much ££££££ Back for the victim in this case. Why should Vermin like this be excluded from ‘NOT’ paying back what they STOLE
-
Bailiffs are legally allowed to seize property to the value of the debt. Why is this not happening for victims of fraud?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Custodial sentences should be increased topped up with fines that they SHOULD be paying back... Bollocks to this, they’re are doing time. That’s NOT GOOD ENOUGH !!! On its own... the system and law is wrong and far too lenient, deterrents should be in place for re-offending

Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
