-
-
Replying to @curiousshrink
You know those statements could easily apply to emotional and sexual fraudsters too. They read you emotionally to stay ahead of the game and ensure their deception remains hidden to allow them access to their needs.
#Narcissist#catfish1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
-
Replying to @curiousshrink
It just makes me sad and angry that more importance is always given to financial fraud
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AnnaRowe123
Not quite. Individual frauds, all kinds, gets overlooked unless the fraudster is scamming very large number of people or targeting vulnerable populations. Often it's about resources and likelihood of a good sentence at the end of it. Or are you talking about lying vs defrauding?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @curiousshrink
I know the loss has to be very high for police to act. I sat and listened to the head of online fraud discussing their stats at a committee in parliament. It’s the same country wide. Fraud is lying I believe
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AnnaRowe123
Yes I know. Problem is that a one-off case with a small loss will not get a sentence, which is a shame as that would certainly deter criminals so police prioritise. Scammers frequently keep amounts low to not be detected as low amounts don't even get reported by people.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.