Fantastic new article by @AnnaHolliday on the Energy Technologies Institute. It was founded to accelerate low carbon innovation to meet climate targets. What did it get right (and wrong), and what lessons can current organisations like @Catapult_UK learn?https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422421000204?dgcid=author …
-
Show this thread
-
Wow - just read the abstract and will be fascinated to understand how the conclusion (mentioned in the abstract) that
@the_ETI pursued "more incremental technologies and outputs"... Certainly didn't feel that way working there@becksboo21@Andy1Boston@haines_g2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Georgeday27 @watsonjim2 and
What was the assumed baseline from which the work was judged to be incremental? I’d argue lots of the work done at eti years ago is innovative even now.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @haines_g @Georgeday27 and
For example whole systems thinking was core to eti work. It has since become a buzzword in the energy industry but few seem to really understand it and apply it like the eti did.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @haines_g @Georgeday27 and
So incremental in terms of technology outputs. I agree that ESME+ developing whole systems thinking are great, but in terms of tech the outputs are primarily tools, monitoring+ components to support deployment. This isn't negative+ reflects the energy innov system at the time
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Let me know if you'd like the full article and I'll get it over to you
-
-
Replying to @AnnaHolliday @Georgeday27 and
Yes if you could send me a copy of the paper that be excellent cheers
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
PhD energy innovation 

Into decarbonisation, regeneration & climate/crypto 