Important (open access!) commentary by @Miklos_Antal @giulio_mattioli and @Imogen_tweets on the importance of researching reality (duh?): why we should study UNSUSTAINABLE transitions (like SUVs, air travel, shale gas, fast fashion, plastics, palm oil).https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422420300277 …
-
-
Hi Anna, I would argue that it is more important to study (and hence counter) the rise in SUVs and continual expansion of fossil fuel use. In physics, we always try to understand the dominant trend first - without that, we are flying blind. See also
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422418301576?via%3Dihub … -
Hey, my objection was more to you referring to sustainability trends as 'marginal, niche and feel good', which mischaracterises RE & EV expansion+ implies their study isn't important. The article you cite doesn't share the same attitude. Studying both is important+ complementary
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
'marginal or niche' has to be related to scale of the challenge they are related to. In terms of the mitigation rates & timeframe of staying within 1.5-2°C carbon budgets, I see these 'emerging global transitions' as marginal. They are, of course, still key areas to be studied.
-
I'm confused.. if we're to stay within carbon budgets surely understanding current technological regimes and what is needed to technologically, politically and economically change them is key? Part of this is understanding shorter term how to disincentive unsustainable tech
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
PhD energy innovation 

Into decarbonisation, regeneration & climate/crypto 