An interesting point right? Though largely to do with licencing process - a lot of UK designs close to market are based on smaller versions of existing tech.
-
-
-
Yes very.. I've been at events where people are predicting commercial scale SMNRs with integrated CHP by 2030, so I assumed we at least had the tech down... Are there not successful designs used in submarines and things?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s not as simple as just wiring up a submarine reactor to the grid, sadly. Would need to develop a design, and license it, then build first of class. 15y is plausible, 11 pushes it. 1/2.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2/2. The issue is paying for it. To justify the multi-£bn development cost, even a credible vendor with an existing team would need maybe 20+ firm orders at an attractive price to make the business case fly. Could any UK government credibly sign such a contract?
-
I assumed that as the tech had been used in appliances like subs it would be much further down the road to commercialisation.. so given potential social resistance to 'community nuclear' I'm even more sceptical that these investment levels will ever be reached
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
PhD energy innovation 

Into decarbonisation, regeneration & climate/crypto 
Thanks 