Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
AnnCoulter's profile
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter
Verified account
@AnnCoulter

Tweets

Ann CoulterVerified account

@AnnCoulter

Author - follow me on #Facebook! http://goo.gl/JvMjld 

Los Angeles/NYC
anncoulter.com
Joined September 2010

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    Ann Coulter‏Verified account @AnnCoulter Oct 30

    Ann Coulter Retweeted Jonathan Swan

    No federal law & no Supreme Court has ever stated that children born to illegals are citizens. Anchor babies come from an aside in a Justice Brennan FOOTNOTE.https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/1057206620659290112 …

    Ann Coulter added,

    Jonathan SwanVerified account @jonathanvswan
    Exclusive: Trump to terminate birthright citizenship https://www.axios.com/trump-birthright-citizenship-executive-order-0cf4285a-16c6-48f2-a933-bd71fd72ea82.html?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=twsocialshare&utm_campaign=organic …
    5:33 AM - 30 Oct 2018
    • 3,309 Retweets
    • 6,910 Likes
    • Maria Alvarez EdwZactly⭐️⭐️⭐️ pjlark Laura concerned citizen Red Wave Rising 🇺🇸Trump2020❌ 🇺🇸Brenda ❌ forsaleandlease Gene Rogers
    481 replies 3,309 retweets 6,910 likes
      1. New conversation
      2. Jack Lindell‏ @mydogleonard Oct 30
        Replying to @AnnCoulter

        Except SCOTUS already explicitly stated that the 14th amendment specifically provides for birthright citizenship in 1898.

        4 replies 0 retweets 18 likes
      3. Jeffrey R. Johnson‏ @TulsaJeffJ Oct 30
        Replying to @mydogleonard @AnnCoulter

        They got that wrong, and they can correct it. Good thing we don't have to abide by precedents like Dred Scott, eh?

        3 replies 2 retweets 21 likes
      4. Jack Lindell‏ @mydogleonard Oct 30
        Replying to @TulsaJeffJ @AnnCoulter

        and by "get that wrong" you mean, reading verbatim the 14th amendment

        1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
      5. Jeffrey R. Johnson‏ @TulsaJeffJ Oct 30
        Replying to @mydogleonard @AnnCoulter

        So what do you think "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" means? If you are not a legal resident you don't consider yourself subject to the laws of the land. Or can I choose which laws I want to be subject to?

        4 replies 1 retweet 17 likes
      6. Jack Lindell‏ @mydogleonard Oct 30
        Replying to @TulsaJeffJ @AnnCoulter

        4) even the writer of the 14th amendment stated that it applies to anyone born here other than the children of foreign diplomats http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=073/llcg073.db&recNum=11 …

        2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
      7. Jeffrey R. Johnson‏ @TulsaJeffJ Oct 30
        Replying to @mydogleonard @AnnCoulter

        Not just foreign diplomats, but also "foreigners" and "aliens". His statement was a list.

        2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes
      8. Jack Lindell‏ @mydogleonard Oct 30
        Replying to @TulsaJeffJ @AnnCoulter

        "Subject to the jurisdiction" in his context is a qualifier to exclude foreign diplomats and their children who are by virtue of their declared allegiance to a foreign entity, not subject to the jurisdiction of the US

        0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
      9. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. aagcobb‏ @aagcobb1 Oct 30
        Replying to @AnnCoulter

        If you are an originalist, you are wrong. There was no such thing as an illegal immigrant in 1868, so the writers of the 14th Amendment could not have intended to exclude them from birthright citizenship. It literally says "all persons."

        2 replies 2 retweets 19 likes
      3. jaybakerAZ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️‏ @jaybakeraz Oct 30
        Replying to @aagcobb1

        pic.twitter.com/6A1XOKXzbz

        2 replies 4 retweets 10 likes
      4. aagcobb‏ @aagcobb1 Oct 30
        Replying to @jaybakeraz @AnnCoulter

        And if you read US v. Wong Kim Ark, the children of diplomats is one of the very limited exceptions to birthright citizenship inherited from English common law. But that decision also determined that the children of immigrants born in the US do acquire birthright citizenship.

        0 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
      5. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Randall Shrader‏ @Wildk1200 Oct 30
        Replying to @AnnCoulter

        In 1866 the Senate Judiciary ruled that they are not citizens. http://www.federalistblog.us/2007/09/revisiting_subject_to_the_jurisdiction/ …

        7 replies 3 retweets 23 likes
      3. Mike Dixon‏ @deep_state1 Oct 30
        Replying to @Wildk1200 @AnnCoulter

        Actually, Turnbull who authored the Civil Rights Act of 1866 argued it DID apply to children born in the US of foreign parents. If you want to play history, you'd better have ALL the facts.

        3 replies 1 retweet 10 likes
      4. Mike Dixon‏ @deep_state1 Oct 30
        Replying to @deep_state1 @Wildk1200 @AnnCoulter

        *Trumbull.

        0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
      5. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Gerald Hatton‏ @Gerald_AU Oct 30
        Replying to @the_real_Lord @AnnCoulter

        "And subject to the jurisdiction there of" is the key phrase here being argued. Illegal entry automatically violates this. Meaning "owing loyalty to another nation" as in the one they are Naturally from.

        13 replies 14 retweets 91 likes
      3. Tweet unavailable
      4. Gerald Hatton‏ @Gerald_AU Oct 30
        Replying to @the_real_Lord @AnnCoulter

        What? Words not directly addressing the issue in a court ruling, now is applied to parts of the constitution you don't like? Dicta refers to words in a court ruling NOT directly related. The constitution is not a ruling and the second half of the sentence directly applies.

        3 replies 1 retweet 41 likes
      5. V̶O̶X̶ U̶M̶B̶R̶A̶‏ @umbra_vox Oct 30
        Replying to @Gerald_AU @the_real_Lord @AnnCoulter

        United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 693 (1898).

        4 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
      6. Gerald Hatton‏ @Gerald_AU Oct 30
        Replying to @umbra_vox @the_real_Lord @AnnCoulter

        I think you know the issue with this case applying to illegal immigrants concerning "having domicile in the USA" already. The fact is, the SCOTUS will have to rule on this and/or legislation passed to directly address it. Which is finally going to happen.

        1 reply 2 retweets 30 likes
      7. V̶O̶X̶ U̶M̶B̶R̶A̶‏ @umbra_vox Oct 30
        Replying to @Gerald_AU @the_real_Lord @AnnCoulter

        SCOTUS isn't going to hear it if the ruling from the lower court is proper.

        2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
      8. Gerald Hatton‏ @Gerald_AU Oct 30
        Replying to @umbra_vox @the_real_Lord @AnnCoulter

        SCOTUS will hear it regardless because the lower court will be challenged regardless of how they rule. Only possible exception is legislation before it gets to SCOTUS. Which would be the bes thing anyway.

        3 replies 1 retweet 29 likes
      9. 20 more replies

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info