Honestly, I don’t know if I’m with @daniela_witten or @NAChristakis.
1) Paper makes bombastic conclusions that are unjustified by data.
2) Point 1 holds for other papers in area BUT their conclusions are not as harmful
3) Is retraction of one paper easy out for @NatureComms?https://twitter.com/daniela_witten/status/1329663766993072129 …
I think the best course of action is retraction with detailed explanation of the deep flaws in the paper and the way this paper was reviewed.
-
-
Not sure if you saw reviews. So tone deaf! Shows how lack of diversity creates blind spots. One reviewer commented how this was not surprising = confirms all my biases
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.