You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Honestly, I don’t know if I’m with @daniela_witten or @NAChristakis.
1) Paper makes bombastic conclusions that are unjustified by data.
2) Point 1 holds for other papers in area BUT their conclusions are not as harmful
3) Is retraction of one paper easy out for @NatureComms?https://twitter.com/daniela_witten/status/1329663766993072129 …
I am disappointed that this is even a debate. As a #WomenInSTEM this shows mountain of bias we have to live with. It is pervasive. The damage it will do to further deter women from entering STEM and/or seeking out women mentors should alone be enough to burn this garbage
Hi @AnimaAnandkumar - I completely agree with you the paper is both both unsound and harmful. It was a mistake to publish it. Women in science face enough barriers as it is!
Question is what is the best way to mitigate the harm that was done, and I really don’t know the answer.
I think the best course of action is retraction with detailed explanation of the deep flaws in the paper and the way this paper was reviewed.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
