@TavoGuerreroE mira algo así es que tengo en mente, estos métodos no requieren una mesh, no dependen de la resolución. Imaginas aplicar esto a MHD ?https://twitter.com/AnimaAnandkumar/status/1319055677260611586 …
-
Así a primera vista parecen muy viscosas para ese número de Reynolds de 10000, no? De donde sale la física en estos casos? Voy a ver paper.
The methodology is applicable to any parametric pde family. What did you have in mind? @ZongyiLiCaltech
-
-
Any turbulent problem where the small scales contribute to the large scales via dissipation but also some inverse-cascade process, e.g., development of large-scale flows in rotating turbulent convection, or the dynamo mechanism in MHD. I'm right
@el_pachocamacho? -
yes, as you may know the main limitation to achieve High Reynolds number in traditional numerical simulations is the resolution. These "meshless" methods seem promising in attaining, in a faster and cheaper(?) way, high fidelity simulations of turbulent flow.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.