I agree with @zicokolter so many young people are extremely stressed about desk rejects at @NeurIPSConf I urge the chairs to remove this to ease stress on young people @RaiaHadsellhttps://twitter.com/zicokolter/status/1268040743198887936 …
-
As an AC I feel extremely uncomfortable doing this, as I also felt as Senior PC in IJCAI. I tweeted about this when it was first proposed months ago. A paper should be desk rejected based on its own merit or lack of it, not because it is in bottom 20%
I have a student extremely concerned about talking about societal bias in #AI models because that may lead to desk rejection @NeurIPSConf this is now more power in hands of a few. Not good for @InclusionInML
-
-
Another major flaw of the existing peer review system and those who created the status quo will not have interest in changing it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why would this lead to desk rejection? The subject area of the paper is not related to probability of desk reject. NeurIPS has a top level category on 'Social Aspects of ML' so this seems both in scope and timely - please encourage your student to submit! https://neurips.cc/Conferences/2020/PaperInformation/SubjectAreas …
-
1/ Thanks for responding
@RaiaHadsell in theory there should be freedom of speech and we should be able to state that there are societal biases. This paper still an algorithms paper that can help alleviate it if used correctly. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.