resorting to attacking me seems like the wrong way to handle this. I liked it to acknowledge that I read it. I'd advise you to mute the conversation.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @craigss @BeEngelhardt
If you care to understand the future of AI, read
@BeEngelhardt's work instead of attacking her. If you regret omitting women & PoC from your article, apologize & write in@nytimes about how to combat the forces that led to it. And stop feeling sorry for yourself- it's pathetic.0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes I read your April 11 tweet. And I also read your tweet two above this one where you called Prof. Engelhardt, a distinguished professor of computer science at Princeton University and a leading expert on machine learning, a troll.
0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Herein lies the problem. You asked a bunch of men what they think of the future of AI (and BTW many of their answers are BS), yet what you're asking Prof. Engelhardt is to shut up publicly so you feel better about yourself.
0 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I'm engaging with you in the hopes that you will reflect on the situation, and instead of brushing aside the complaints about your article, consider what the real story is when it comes to ML and AI (and write about it). A good starting point: interview Prof. Engelhardt.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
If you are serious withdraw the shameful article from @nytimes I can't believe that you publicly declared that you won't interview @BeEngelhardt because she held you accountable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.