You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I know these debates can be acrimonious sometimes but I do welcome ideas for improving our academic language - I'm just not convinced in this case.
you don't need to be convinced to be supportive. If a marginalized group in the community is negatively affected and there is no harm done to you by the name change, why not support it as a good will gesture to signal inclusion? I emphasize this in my post
Name change debate is a barometer to deeper issues in STEM. Pseudo intellectuala vehemently opposing it and writing reams of articles shows toxicity in community. It is fine to be not convinced or be neutral but vehement opposition is a bad sign
I agree, but we don't have a marginalized group who is harmed by q supremacy (again unlike N[eur]IPS). The NIPS jokes sounded awful. Here's what a supremacy joke looks like:https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/classical
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
