Agree w the premise but not the method. Using images without consent is wrong, even if it’s to make a good point. We aren’t above the standards we set for others.
Many researchers including me @timnitGebru @rajiinio @jovialjoy Yoshua Bengio signed a letter last year asking @awscloud to stop selling rekognition to law enforcement. It is not ready. It is inaccurate and not calibrated. It is racist and sexist.https://twitter.com/fightfortheftr/status/1195100706669240320 …
-
-
-
I do agree. Although I come from a tradition of activism where who uses a tool is as important as the tool being used. That is: how does that facial recog system changes the power landscape? If using it gave power back to oppressed people, I'd be ok. 1/2
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Still a no. I don't want anyone to automate stalking.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This is where proactive regulations and policy advocacy is needed, unfortunately we do not have many scientists/engineers in these roles either, less so women.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In most use cases, it will never be ready. It shouldn't be used.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It would still be unethical for surveillance purposes even if it were highly accurate, in my opinion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.